Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

WP:AFD/Y

Purge page cache if page isn't updating.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 30	May 02 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Asaba Jumah (born 2005)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, only mentions anywhere are on blog sites, social media and a site called "Jetbits" (freeware maybe?) Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 23:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Zero sourcing found, only another article in draft space and a wix site. Very non notable individual. Oaktree b (talk) 01:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, Video games, Computing, Internet, and Uganda. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Lehigh Valley IronPigs Opening Day starting pitchers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No indication of meeting WP:NLIST. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Baseball, and Pennsylvania. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. This is pure trivia/fancruft about a minor league baseball club. No SIGCOV on the topic. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST. Cbl62 (talk) 23:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The list documents a recurring, specific role that’s consistently covered in local news and team media. As a yearly thing, Opening Day starters are a recognized part of a team’s season narrative. They attention every year from sources like MiLB.com, and team press releases. here’s nothing random or fancrufty about it if I am going to be honest with you. If the issue is sourcing, that can be fixed. I think there’s enough here to improve the article rather than delete it. Same thing applies with the other one.
TBJ10RH (talk) 01:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You would need multiple independent reliable sources providing in-depth coverage of the topic. Routine news coverage announcing who will be that year's opening-day pitcher does not suffice. Cbl62 (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That can be easily fixable but validating the page for AFD is a bit too much in my opinion. TBJ10RH (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are no independent reliable sources in this list which indicate that WP:LISTN is met. In other words, it must be shown why this deserves to be a standalone list, as opposed to part of the team's article. Just because individual parts of the list can be cited, it does not mean that the sum total of the parts are notable as a list. Further, I found no previous discussion that this should be be split from the team's article. Flibirigit (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A list of historic rosters may be relevant, but I don't see why opening day is significant. Reywas92^Talk 02:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I get it. But, Opening Day starters hold special weight in baseball. Even at the minor league level, teams and media highlight who gets the ball to start the season. Usually the local papers, MiLB.com, and team press releases often call attention to it. It’s more than just a roster detail. If the concern is that the article doesn’t yet show why it's significant, that feels like something we can fix through edits. Maybe by adding brief context or citations. Not by removing the article entirely. This seems like a case where cleanup or improvement would serve Wikipedia better than deletion. TBJ10RH (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: MiLB.com and team press releases are not "independent" and have no bearing on whether the topic passes the GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbl62 (talk • contribs)

In Major League Baseball, opening day starters are discussed frequently in independent sources. I cannot say the same for the minor leagues. Please note that coverage by teams, is not independent, nor considered reliable for encyclopedia purpose. Flibirigit (talk) 02:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will note that going forward on the articles later. Thank you TBJ10RH (talk) 02:32, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gwinnett Stripers Opening Day starting pitchers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No indication this passes WP:NLIST. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Lists of people, Baseball, and Georgia (U.S. state). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. This is pure trivia/fancruft about a minor league baseball club. No SIGCOV on the topic. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST. Cbl62 (talk) 23:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The list documents a recurring, specific role that’s consistently covered in local news and team media. As a yearly thing, Opening Day starters are a recognized part of a team’s season narrative. They attention every year from sources like MiLB.com, Gwinnett Daily Post, and team press releases. here’s nothing random or fancrufty about it if I am going to be honest with you. If the issue is sourcing, that can be fixed. I think there’s enough here to improve the article rather than delete it. Same thing applies with the other one. TBJ10RH (talk) 01:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You would need multiple independent reliable sources providing in-depth coverage of the topic. Routine news coverage announcing who will be that year's opening-day pitcher does not suffice. Cbl62 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That can be easily fixable but validating the page for AFD is a bit too much in my opinion. TBJ10RH (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it's easly fixable, please provide the "Three best sources" (or even "two") that provide in depth coverage of the topic. Cbl62 (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are no independent reliable sources in this list which indicate that WP:LISTN is met. In other words, it must be shown why this deserves to be a standalone list, as opposed to part of the team's article. Just because individual parts of the list can be cited, it does not mean that the sum total of the parts are notable as a list. Further, I found no previous discussion that this should be be split from the team's article. Flibirigit (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that the list may lack a few independent sources, and I thank you for the feedback, however Opening Day starters are a recurring, notable tradition in baseball that's routinely covered by teams and local media. The list reflects that tradition, not just a collection of facts. It can be improved with context and sourcing, but that’s an editing issue, not a reason to delete. Splitting it from the main article makes sense given its focus and the precedent from similar baseball lists. If you truly have some problems with the article, I can make some changes to add more independent sources that could be deemed reliable although I may need a specific list of those. TBJ10RH (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In Major League Baseball, opening day starters are discussed frequently in independent sources. I cannot say the same for minor league. Please note that coverage by teams, is not independent, nor considered reliable for encyclopedia purpose. Flibirigit (talk) 02:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, thank you Flib TBJ10RH (talk) 02:32, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

.hamburg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable domain name that is used in one city. SL93 (talk) 23:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Germany. SL93 (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not really anything that covers this domain that is not primary.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Elliot (shipwreck)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable sinking of a lighter (barge). Wikipedia is not a (maritime) newspaper. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksandar Gruber

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer that fails WP:GNG, no sources beyond profiles and stats from databases. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: NOTSTATS Fails WP:NSPORTS. The notability criteria is more than a pseudo biography and not a resume. -- Otr500 (talk) 18:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Serbia, and Yugoslavia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep This guy played for fair sized clubs including Lech Poznań and a lot of football at that, he played at the top of his game and played European games. Playing football is not a NOTSTATS issue. I don't know how much media coverage he had in the countries he played for at the time, but I am betting on newspapers here. WP:OFFLINESOURCES. Yes there does seem to be coverage issue, but the internet at this time, is not at the same level on the region, it was still being built up in Serbia at that time. It doesn't help the fact he played during a time of strong geo-political issues in the region. So that might negate searches. I am going to assume good faith here for my weak keep. Govvy (talk) 10:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with @Govvy Боки 💬 📝 06:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Even though he played in smaller centers, he had spells at important clubs in those places, didn't he really find any WP:SIGCOV? Svartner (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AFD Patrol. While there is no clear consensus, the evident lack of SIGCOV is a strong policy-compliant argument. Spartathenian (talk) 19:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sono Mirai wa Ima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails notability guidelines for music; it's a song by a not super well known artist, and this song hasn't won any awards, received coverage, etc. This article doesn't have any citations and is very short. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Japan. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Good Dreams per nom. No hits on Japanese google that is worth mentioning. JP article is also unref. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The claims in the nomination seem to indicate that a WP:BEFORE was not performed in Japanese or that the nominator is not familiar with Japanese music. I don't have any problem with the suggested redirection unless sources are found, but this song did chart nationally in Japan indicating possible notability under WP:NSINGLE, and the group has at least 7 top-10 albums which belies the claim that the artists are obscure. I would suggest trying to find sources in Japanese before nominating similar articles in the future. Dekimasuよ! 22:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello -- thanks for pointing that out; I'm not knowledgeable in this area and in the future I will search for sources in the original language. My statement that the group wasn't notable was incorrect, I agree with the redirect idea. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, is there more support for Redirection? Or other options?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FreeBSD Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable organisation Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Colorado. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 14:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Redirect to FreeBSD#Foundation where important info is already included.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:38, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is certainly a notable organization that has coverage in sources. I think this article needs improvement, not deletion. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 13:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexeyevitch Can you provide examples of significant coverage? I have found no WP:SIGCOV about the foundation that meets the requirements of WP:NORG. Anything in depth I've found about the foundation relies of heavily on interviews which does not meet requirements for establishing notability under WP:NORG. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shyam Steel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a G5 as an IP had some copyediting, but that might be a sock of the original banned editor, and I don't know enough about Indian companies to determine if the organisation is notable or not. So here's a discussion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare at Home

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The NGO is not notable, with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Unicorbia (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disparity between search engines. Google returns different results compared to DuckDuckGo for example when searching the NGO. Using only Google perhaps yields a narrow or biased return. 2A00:23C6:F213:4101:968:2B7B:BF67:615B (talk) 06:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article displays similar references and citations as other NGO’s and organisations in the genre. I feel the NGO is notable but can see the counter argument as well. Thanks and good luck! Beusefulbekind (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When the NGO’s website is entered into a search engine images are returned suggesting an indexing issue over lack of significant coverage. https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&sca_esv=017810d95fc5d12f&q=www.shakespeareathome.org&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_BwhWbvgbq2-ldlJF_Xac4lwl4ZcQUKTNIEuq5aS_Zepj3qrSaXICRsYV5N74W3tzTRfsLFSrRz7ve1CoHJgcglLv8SGrSnkSeQFpu99wkeRdrZTbMXqXfA4_2TUZF5W45mnxYixR6y-5GTsKmF4TU8r9fiioDaNvE04XkK00AiS4qkNAWLdgnUAFsVApJDZA96ejXZyPTbx_jw3pTzfiHatMhw34ZCCznojS7RIg27Jp-Vdsc&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiVj7PtwvKMAxUGWkEAHZaHLDoQtKgLegQIGBAB&biw=402&bih=677&dpr=3 2A00:23C6:F213:4101:968:2B7B:BF67:615B (talk) 06:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moed Ahmed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Masscreated LUGSTUB with no credible assertion of notability under WP:NSPORTS. FOARP (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Pakistan. FOARP (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to an appropriate list of players if possible. Vestrian24Bio 07:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Do not propose a Merge or Redirection if you don't have a target article in mind.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WRC Rally Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article clearly fails the Wikipedia Notability guidelines for TV. This is a TV show that seems to have been a one-off for the Monte Carlo Rally, lasting for just one season. This smells of promotion, too. There also aren't any citations, and there has been a citations tag since December 2009, 16 years ago. This article must be deleted. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 10:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Speed, cannot find anything substantive online Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Motorsport. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A very WP:MILL pre-race show; just stated the latest results, did some profiles and previewed the next race, all of which are well expected and basic out of any pre-race show. And I agree with the nominator's PROMO concerns, as the article was created when it aired. Nathannah • 📮 18:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shatta Gyal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not come close to meeting WP:NSONG. Sources are trivial mentions, promotional in nature, and/or from unreliable sites. The creator of the article also seems to be dealing with COI issues. JTtheOG (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, Netherlands, and Jamaica. JTtheOG (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into ChevoBeatz per rationale by nom, along with Time's Dread. Can we still tag the other song on? Subject needs all material pulled together for a near-decent article and for the GNG. gidonb (talk) 20:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I'm reluctant to delete a song that made it on to two different national charts. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’d say calling the “Hype Tv Jamaica” chart a notable WP:CHART would be a stretch. Even then, charting alone does not confer notability, especially considering the dearth of in-depth coverage available. JTtheOG (talk) 00:47, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep song has charted Lil Happy Lil Sad ^:): 09:38, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Charting alone does not confer notability, as per NSONG. JTtheOG (talk) 10:13, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep song has charted. Barr Theo (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:VOTE. JTtheOG (talk) 17:31, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A source analysis would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not only has the song charted, but I did a brief source analysis. Covered in two seeminygly reputable Surinamese newspapers -- De West and De Ware Tijd, two newspapers with among the highest circulations in Suriname. We also have a tabloid-esque source in the Jamaica Star. With the charting and De West and De Ware Tijd, looks like notability guidelines are met. Not that is article doesn't have problems, it could be vastly improved, with grammar and NPOV. It looks like the nominator did not perform an adequate WP:BEFORE check.AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Info (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBAND, promotional, no reliable sources to support. Closest thing I could find directly about the band was a merch site [1]. GoldRomean (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GoldRomean (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Well, I edited it a couple hours ago, and conjured only these three sources ([2], [3], [4]) by typing "Colombia" and "INFO" and "metal". Couldn't find anything on their albums. Potentially leaning towards weak keep, but we need plus ~1 source. LastJabberwocky (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Leaning towards keep. —LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cladistic classification of Sarcopterygii

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to have been created with the sole purpose of being a taxonomic list not based on the classification of any particular author. I tried replacing some of the content with actual published classifications, though without actually expecting this page to evolve into something useful. Everything that can be included here can also be included in Sarcopterygii. Kiwi Rex (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Hurghada attack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:NOTNEWS. Coverage is in the immediate days after the attack, no WP:LASTING or WP:SUSTAINED that establish WP:GNG. Open to an appropriate merge target. Longhornsg (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Terrorism, Egypt, Armenia, Czech Republic, and Germany. Longhornsg (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Terrorism in Egypt#Red Sea resort attacks (2016–17), where it is mentioned. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for a Redirection?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla Jean Carter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. No significant sources to speak of. She didn't even win the Miss Charm Philippines beauty pageant, a title of very recent and somewhat dubious(?) existence. She was appointed when the titleholder withdrew. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, Philippines, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don Anding

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this American former soccer player. JTtheOG (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania. JTtheOG (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Some coverage: PennLive, Philly Inquirer, Patch.com. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 14:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- What's wrong with e.g. PennLive, which was 700 words on him? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Pinging @GiantSnowman: in case he did not see Beanie's comment. JTtheOG (talk) 09:30, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  PennLive is good - not enough on its own. Giant Snowman 12:37, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: At the very least, this should be redirected to All-time Philadelphia Union roster as a WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 02:02, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft deletion as there are editors objecting to Deletion stance.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The Penn Live article mentioned above is all I can find as well, other than the team's website. I don't see enough sourcing to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Colts–Jaguars rivalry

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to have coverage from sources discussing a rivalry, and as such WP:NRIVALRY is not met. Article was recreated after being deleted in a earlier deletion discussion and while this version has more sourcing, it still does not have sources to meet the notability guidelines. Let'srun (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, American football, Florida, and Indiana. Let'srun (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak Delete No sources seem to cover the rivalry in-depth. The sheer number of routine coverage articles seems like a WP:REFBOMB, so it's difficult to say for sure whether all 100+ sources have no significant coverage. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Clear pass of WP:NRIVALRY from my perspective. As much as I've supported getting rid of a number of rivalry articles, I can't fathom deleting one about two division rivals who have played each other twice a year for 23 years. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NRIVALRY requires GNG level coverage discussing the rivalry in-depth. Which sources do you thing cover this series as a rivalry? Let'srun (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an expert on NFL rivalries, but a quick search in Newspapers.com reveals many sources discussing the pairing as a rivalry. E.g., (1) "Colts, Jaguars renew rivalry", (2) "Colts-Jaguars South rivalry getting intense" (part 1/part 2), (3) "Rivalry has evolved quickly", (4) "this series has emerged as the division's best rivalry", (5) "Young rivalry gets stirred up", (6) "Colts' 'rivalry' fires up Jags" - early article discussing factors (part 1/part 2), (7) "There's no love lost: Plenty of bad blood between rivals Colts, Jaguars". Why doesn't such extensive coverage reporting on the rivalry show that there is or was a rivalry? Cbl62 (talk) 01:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I think that most of these pieces are merely WP:ROUTINE game previews where the term 'rivalry' is used as a buzzword by journalists to try and get more people to read their paper, and do not cover the history of the purported 'rivalry' in-depth as needed to meet the guidelines. Let'srun (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cbl62's sources. WP:NRIVALRY is one sentence deep and really shouldn't be used as the crutch for rivalry articles anyways. This would be a better way of calling it what it is User:Conyo14/Sports rivalries. Conyo14 (talk) 05:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is more of divisional opponents rather than rivalry, since the two have had different eras of success, I wouldn't say it's a fierce rivalry, but I wouldn't say it's worthy of it's own page.

I'd say a similar thing about the Jaguars-Texans rivalry. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the sources presented by Cbl62 appear to be sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources do you think provide WP:SIGCOV of the rivalry itself, beyond WP:ROUTINE game coverage/previews? Let'srun (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus here yet. A source review would br helpful. One thing I've seen over the years is that WP:ROUTINE is in the eye of the beholder.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some further notes on a couple of the sources cited above:

Source (3) is a three-column feature story from a highly reputable source (the Associated Press) expressly focused on the rivalry published under the headline "Rivalry has evolved quickly." It traces the history of "a trash-talking atmosphere", the recent history of past games, the "geeked up" approach of the players to facing each other, and concludes in no uncertain terms that "this series has emerged as the division's best rivalry."

Source (7) reviews the rivalry's 17-game history, the close finish in 13 of the 17 games, the "brutally competitive" nature of the games, the history of trash-talking including Colts referring to Jax as "our little brother", and a focus on the "bad blood" between the rivals ("They don't like us. We don't like them.")

Cbl62 (talk) 02:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tiempo Sin Verte

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, fails WP:NSONG. Sricsi (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since it not a notable song with much coverage aside from promotions. Ramos1990 (talk) 02:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AFD Patrol. Lack of interest would suggest no consensus, but the arguments raised are both convincing and policy-compliant. Recommend closure over relisting. Spartathenian (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What's with these AFD Patrol comments? Let's leave the closing decisions to the closers, and keep the discussion on track. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Sirfurboy. Please see WP:AfD Patrol. The object of patrolling is to ensure discussions are "on track" via policy compliance. Furthermore, any editor can make a closure recommendation, and the point of my "closure over relisting" comment was that this case, having just reached its seven-day cut-off, might have been relisted without due consideration of the two arguments raised. Relisting should be avoided, if possible, because of the weight it adds to current day nomination pages. Since my recommendation, case status was significantly altered by Ingratis, whose argument is valid, and so Explicit had to relist, correctly in my view. Spartathenian (talk) 09:24, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. That project is long inactive, but the "what to do" section is all good practice and to be encouraged. When I do those things, I just bold the word comment, because that is what I am doing. However, note that none of the six suggestions involve providing a recommendation to the closer. We generally let closers arrive at their own independent assessment based on the discussion. Closers usually have a lot of experience at AFD they can rely on, but if you want to steer them at all, just bold a !vote and explain why you lean that way. Nevertheless, by all means do comment to try to keep discussions focussed on policy and guidance. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I've taken that on board, and am using comment now. I didn't know the patrol is inactive, though. Thanks and best wishes. Spartathenian (talk) 12:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the references given, but if adjudged non-notable then Redirect to album per WP:NSONG. Ingratis (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: WP:NSONG requires that the song is "the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." The article has over 20 of those as references and more can still be easily be found on Google search. 1arch (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Las Mujeres Ya No Lloran. The song is not independently notable, although the Album appears to be. GNG requires significant coverage of the song in secondary and independent reliable sources. We do not have that. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of refs in independent sources dealing specifically with the song rather than with the whole album, which suggests SIGCOV, but as said I'd not be unhappy with a redirect to the album. Ingratis (talk) 10:11, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think the article has anything that couldn't be worked into the album article. Wish it would have at least some chart performance to make it more relevant. Kirtap92 (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, no consensus here yet
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nassau (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Sricsi (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I looked at the sources on the song's page, and I think that this song is the subject of enough sources to meet WP:NSONG. Opm581^{(talk | he/him)} 04:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep, basically per Opm581. BD2412 T 02:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The track doesn't meet WP:NSONGS, no chart performance either. Kirtap92 (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Kirtap92. DarkHorseHayhem (talk) 00:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not relevant - please comment the actual sources Geschichte (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to source album, Las Mujeres Ya No Lloran. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet. A source analysis would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nushell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage in reliable sources. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tucsonians for a Clean Environment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, none of the sources actually discuss the article subject, for which the article is effectively a large background section, but neither cites nor discusses. ~ A412 ^talk! 21:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, United States of America, and Arizona. ~ A412 ^talk! 21:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tatiana Auguste

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created for an assumed victor of an MP race in the 2025 Canadian federal election. A recount later confirmed that this candidate in fact lost the seat to the incumbent, and since Canadian MP articles are only created for actual race winners, this article no longer meets the wikipedia notability standard. The simple fact that this person was initially assumed to have won the race for three days does not change this. This info can be reflected on the incumbent's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchMonth (talk • contribs) 20:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - as per above. Rushtheeditor (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which WP:CSD does this fall under? -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. It will go to an automatic recount - this first flip was from an initial validation for obvious errors - and there's a possibility of it flipping again. Better to have this in the drafts than outright deleting. @ArchMonth and Rushtheeditor: If we have agreement on this can be out of mainspace now instead of waiting for the AFD to close. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This would be what happened to Draft:Honveer Singh Randhawa when Surrey-Guildford was initially called by some outlets then flipped after all the votes came in. WP:G13 would apply eventually if nothing happens. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – The judicial recount in question hasn't yet taken place. What happened was the pre-recount numbers being updated during an Elections Canada validation process, so it could end up being reversed again once the recount occurs. I'm not sure offhand if there is a precedent for pending situations like this. If the recount confirms Sinclair-Desgagné's victory, I would be fully in support. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 01:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see @Patar knight's comments while writing mine, I agree with draftify. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 01:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: seems fine, if this person wins, the article goes live; if not, we don't quite have enough for notability. Could be a brief mention in the riding article if needed. Oaktree b (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Canada, and Haiti. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gambling Zone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only the most passing of mentions or sources that don't mention the company. A BEFORE search didn't turn up anything that meets WP:NCORP. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of sheriffs of Daviess County, Kentucky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V as no sources seem to have researched this information before. The page, which has no citations, is likely a combination of synthesis and original research. The page further fails WP:N as Daviess County has a population of about 100,000; much larger places lack articles listing their sheriffs. Mad Mismagius (talk) 21:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Kentucky. Shellwood (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not meeting WP:GNG. This is verifiable official sheriff website, but does not receive significant coverage as a role in the county government that is not the head. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scannata

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, WP:NOTDICT, etc. This was originally obfuscated spam for a record company but the creator removed the spammy part after I applied G11. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Italy. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per not dictionary. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with nom. It is just like any other word - not notable enough to have an article. Asteramellus (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tatiana Auguste

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created for an assumed victor of an MP race in the 2025 Canadian federal election. A recount later confirmed that this candidate in fact lost the seat to the incumbent, and since Canadian MP articles are only created for actual race winners, this article no longer meets the wikipedia notability standard. The simple fact that this person was initially assumed to have won the race for three days does not change this. This info can be reflected on the incumbent's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchMonth (talk • contribs) 20:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - as per above. Rushtheeditor (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which WP:CSD does this fall under? -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. It will go to an automatic recount - this first flip was from an initial validation for obvious errors - and there's a possibility of it flipping again. Better to have this in the drafts than outright deleting. @ArchMonth and Rushtheeditor: If we have agreement on this can be out of mainspace now instead of waiting for the AFD to close. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This would be what happened to Draft:Honveer Singh Randhawa when Surrey-Guildford was initially called by some outlets then flipped after all the votes came in. WP:G13 would apply eventually if nothing happens. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – The judicial recount in question hasn't yet taken place. What happened was the pre-recount numbers being updated during an Elections Canada validation process, so it could end up being reversed again once the recount occurs. I'm not sure offhand if there is a precedent for pending situations like this. If the recount confirms Sinclair-Desgagné's victory, I would be fully in support. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 01:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see @Patar knight's comments while writing mine, I agree with draftify. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 01:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: seems fine, if this person wins, the article goes live; if not, we don't quite have enough for notability. Could be a brief mention in the riding article if needed. Oaktree b (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Canada, and Haiti. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One-off

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing more than a word definition, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTDICTIONARY. One-off (disambiguation) should be moved here. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not dictionary, does not show notability that would satisfy own page.Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with nom. It is just a regular word - not a significant notable word to have an article. Also, 3 of the cited sources have just the regular usage of word "one-off" (just like any other word) mentioned once or twice. Asteramellus (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I also agree. WP:NOTDICTIONARY applies here. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There is already an adequate entry in Wiktionary, merge is not neccesary.AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twirling Toadstool

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in RS PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable theme park ride. No coverage i can find Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 22:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery Community College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page since 2013. Nothing much to suggest that this sub-degree level private education provider would meet the notability standards for inclusion. JMWt (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Canada. JMWt (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: After taking some time to look for sources that could be used to satisfy notability, I found nothing of substance. There seems to be a couple of CBC articles referencing WP:ILLCON and not much else. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 20:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fred VII

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources. All the so-called references are GI Joe publications. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clark Boulevard Public School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Peel District School Board. Elementary school with no indication of notability. Sources are all local routine coverage. JTtheOG (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Canada. JTtheOG (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Peel District School Board All routine outside the mention about school attendance, which is in no way a defining characteristic for a K-5 school article. Nathannah • 📮 21:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ilker Furat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Boxing and Turkey. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Management, and Aviation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unity Communications

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sourced to PR announcements (fail WP:ORGIND) and "top X companies" type lists (not WP:SIGCOV per WP:ORGTRIV) ~ A412 ^talk! 18:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Philippines, Mexico, United States of America, and Arizona. ~ A412 ^talk! 18:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it reads like an ad and most sources seem to come from the company itself. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moundball

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and orphan for 16 years. Couldn't find any sources with SIGCOV denoting notability. Previous contested PROD. — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is original research lacking any sources whatsoever, let alone WP:SIGCOV. Cbl62 (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump's threat for the destruction of Iranian cultural sites

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NTRUMP. The sources in the article and the sources that i can find are all centered around when the threats were issued and do not support any long lasting impact. There's nothing in this article's contents either that justifies it existing and not just being deleted and having its contents merged in other us-iran diplomacy articles. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Iran, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:FUTURE "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even otherwise-notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident." Politicians and elected officials make threats all the time - but it does not belong on Wikipedia unless it actually occurs.— Maile (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Reactions to the assassination of Qasem Soleimani. Seemingly no lasting coverage, and part of this wider topic. -insert valid name here- (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC

Delete per WP:TRUMPCRUFT. Another one of those "things" by Trump. Unlikely to have lasting coverage nor continued coverage. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 00:59, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mladost, Varna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Wikis in other languages do not offer much. Maybe there are relevant refs in local languages that show the GNG is met. JMWt (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Bulgaria. JMWt (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A quick look in Bulgarian sources shows routine notability - it's one of the largest districts of Varna after all - but it's such a simple stub that what little is there could just be merged to Varna until someone wants to have a better crack at this. SportingFlyer T·C 19:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond a Doubt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources are all unreliable, and my WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any better sources so as to establish notability through WP:NFILM. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Ghana. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The pages that list Ghanian films by year do not include one for 2023. It may be worthwhile to either create a page for 2023 (and have this as the sole entry until others add more) or to combine the other films into a single article until there's enough to justify breaking it off by year. There's no list on the main page for cinema of Ghana, otherwise it could redirect there, I suppose. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2029 Bali gubernatorial election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD with the reasoning that it has been scheduled for 2029. Does not show significant coverage and is WP:TOOSOON Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 17:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting @Everywiki as an article creator Indonesianinfo2 (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Putting please see notice, now. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 17:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable event that is TOOSOON, no coverage and any content about the current position holder is CRYSTALBALL speculation assuming they are running, so that part could be challenged as un-encyclopedic and not verfiied, and then we're left with an empty article describing the date about something happening in the future, which always fails TOOSOON. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is very similar to Next Trinidad and Tobago general election, the election is not for another fourish years. There is not a notable reason to include this page this early. It would be like giving the 2038 U.S. election its own page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KryukovRM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE. Paradoctor (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Paradoctor (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 19:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:A7. Article says itself that "no major media outlets have profiled KryukovRM as of yet". -insert valid name here- (talk) 21:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Nekrasov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Invalid dab page, with a single valid item. I sometimes other bios created, then Alexander Nekrasov (disambiguation) may come in. --Altenmann >talk 16:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quintessential (company)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 April 22 closed with no consensus and I decided it was appropriate to relist. Procedural nomination, no opinion from me. Stifle (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Australia. Stifle (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging those who participated in the previous AFD/DRV: @Commander Keane, Spartaz, Robert McClenon, Deepfriedokra, OwenX, Asilvering, Alpha3031, DotesConks, MCE89, लॉस एंजिल्स लेखक, GMH Melbourne, Darkm777, and Eluchil404:; apologies if I have missed anyone. Stifle (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2029 Central Java gubernatorial election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, two opinion polls have been conducted and all potential candidates are WP:OR as far as i can tell Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Indonesia. Shellwood (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No SIGCOV, TOOSOON.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is very similar to Next Trinidad and Tobago general election, the election is not for another fourish years. There is not a notable reason to include this page this early. It would be like giving the 2038 U.S. election its own page. Agree with assessments that it is WP:TOOSOON and WP:SIGCOV Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Saturday Show (1982 TV series)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can't have it both way if this page goes which at least has a few ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tricky_(TV_series)_(2nd_nomination) then this page along with a few others have to go aswell since it has NO proper REF. IT would be double standards.. --Crazyseiko (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Telegantic Megavision

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can't have it both way if this page goes which at least has a few ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tricky_(TV_series)_(2nd_nomination) then this page along with a few others have to go aswell since it has NO proper REF. Its a shame but double standard cant not be allowed.. --Crazyseiko (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2027 Siliguri Municipal Corporation election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Case of WP:TOOSOON, no coverage about the actual election Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, India, and West Bengal. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agree this is too soon and I can't find any reliable coverage about the election. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2027 West Bengal Municipal election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, nothing I can find covers this. Was previously moved to draft Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, India, and West Bengal. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too soon and no reliable, significant coverage of the future election available. Good candidate for WP:PROD. Not sure why there would be a section about voter turnout in an election that is 2 years away. WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. @Yoblyblob I think these types of pages are good candidates for WP:PROD or WP:MULTIAFD so AfD doesn't get too cluttered.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Anonrfjwhuikdzz I will tag these with PROD in the future Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Mersey Pirate

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/The Mersey Pirate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can't have it both way if this page goes which at least has a few ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tricky_(TV_series)_(2nd_nomination) then this page along with a few others have to go aswell since it has NO proper REF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyseiko (talk • contribs) 15:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2028 West Bengal Panchayat elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, no sources seem to focus on the election specifically. Could be re-created once election gets coverage later on Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, India, and West Bengal. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kat Mon Dieu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only coverage I could find which was not a passing mention was in blogs, which clearly aren't reliable. Golem08 (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Dance. Golem08 (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This was the only RS I could find [5], this person is only briefly mentioned. That's about all there is. What's in the article now aren't RS. Oaktree b (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tanjaret Daghet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous version of this article was deleted by PROD, and a version of this article was moved to the draft space with a statement for publishing, so here we are. No evidence of notability for bands or WP:SIRS in my before. Article formatting shows use of AI and sources to otherwise RS in the article doesn't exist and show evidence of AI hallucination. Other sources don't even refer to the band at all or are just social media. Fails GNG or NBAND. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Syria. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I've tried cleaning this up to make it easier to evaluate, but what remains doesn't meet WP:NBAND. Numerous dead links in the refs. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've tagged the first reference with {{dead link}} but I'll note that the url https://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/documentaries/2017/10/syrias-heavy-metal-exiles-171015100140432.html suggests it was published in 2017 but the wayback machine says it was only crawled once in April of this year and even then it was a 404 page as it is now. A search of "Syria's heavy metal exiles" returns no hits from any Al Jazeera piece that I can find, and I am even having a tough time verifying that /programmes/documentaries/ is a url structure that they've ever used (even presently, they use the American spelling, see [6], "/program/"). Seeing as @Iomrla published this citation on April 4 (the same date it was first crawled) hopefully they can share some further information with us. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 20:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anaida_Poilievre

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Anaida Poilievre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this page meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for a biographical entry. It should also be noted that spouses of Canadian opposition leaders who did not become prime minister do not generally have articles by virtue of that status alone. The-Canadian-Historian (talk) 15:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pierre Poilievre There's just nothing here that justifies a full BLP, a regular political wife doing regular political wife things. Nathannah • 📮 17:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pierre Poilievre, not independently notable. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pierre Poilievre. Notability is not inherited just because their husband is leader of the opposition. On her own merits, political operatives rarely meet notability requirements, though there are exceptions. The sources cited do appear to provide SIGCOV, but it doesn't appear to be independent of her role as a wife to Pierre. Bkissin (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agreed. This page does not meet notability guidelines for a biographical entry. Subject was not a politician, and page seems to exist by virtue of her husband. It should be deleted. Husskeyy (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Malame Mangzha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is next to no coverage of her outside of social media and mentions on the company website. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 15:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HorlarofLagos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject utterly fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. There are insufficient sources to establish notability of any sort. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Photography, Entertainment, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wajihuddin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Masscreated LUGSTUB. The existence of this article casts serious doubt on Cricinfo as a source, since "Wajihuddin" is essentially a surname, with anyone having this name typically being referred to as Wajihuddin Ahmed or Mohammed Wajihuddin. It is entirely possible that the Wajihuddins referred to in the reports collected on Cricinfo are not the same person.

Fails WP:NSPORTS as there is no significant coverage in reliable sources and the only claim to notability is participation-based. FOARP (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Pakistan. FOARP (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, don't think redirect is possible here. Vestrian24Bio 07:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not unknown for cricketers from South Asia to be known simply by a "surname" fwiw, and the chap played plenty of cricket - their are several passing references to him in CricInfo articles at the foot of the CricInfo page, although nothing in depth iirc. CricketArchive has him as Mohammad Wajihuddin, although names used in the two databases can differ a little anyway, but it's likely that that's the name. CA can be tricky to access as it's subscription but there are still, err, ways to do this... Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taleh Ziyadov

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not eligible for G4. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Azerbaijan. Shellwood (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and other language articles fail to indicate more sourcing. Also previous deletion discussion seems to have been for a version of the article that was very similar to this one. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Afzal Tariq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftificaiton (as evident by the cut-paste move) but I believe this to be wholly the work of AI based not just on the erroneous formatting but the sourcing as well. The sources don't lead to real pages, just what an AI might believe a URL might look like. Authored by what appears to be the subject's son, who plays no small role in the biography. Draftification rules would allow the draftification given the obvious COI but there's no need here; the subject is not notable. Delete. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Pakistan. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cannot find anything indicating notability, or really anything at all. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bryansky (rural locality)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List that serves no purpose. Only one rural locality has this name, others does not exist. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Russia. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. The nomination is invalid. All of them exist or existed, just there are no articles written. (I am not sure they are individually notable, this is exactly why one needs a SET index to list them. Ymblanter (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt these articles will be written, as this list has existed for over a decade.

It is completely useless to the readers. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They do not need to be written. This is a SET index, it is perfectly fine to make SET indices which contain redlinks. Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SIA does not say anything about this. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It says "A set index article (SIA) is a list article about a set of items of a specific type that also share the same (or similar) name". In fact, this is the first sentence of WP:SIA. I am not sure what else you want to see there. Ymblanter (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SIA does not say that its "perfectly fine to make SET indices which contain redlinks". WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think at this point I should stop answering because we are not going anywhere. I reiterate my strong opposition to the deletion and my argument that the nomination is baseless. Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note - OP is wrong in claiming that only one village has this name. Several rural localities in Russia and in Ukraine (Crimea) bear the name - in fact, some are "missing" from the list. I do not believe we will get articles on any of those, to be honest, so I have added ILLs to the ones listed. For the record, I believe the list serves a purpose and would vote Keep. Ostalgia (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per @Ymblanter. There have been places called this, the nominator should read the WP:NPLACE. Clear pass. Besides that, it seems that a WP:BEFORE check was not performed. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Lindesay Watson Wemyss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears not to meet WP:BIO. The article text says only that he was a Scottish physician. I read through the first cited source [7], an obituary that gives a fairly complete picture of his life, and I don't see anything in there that would meet WP:BIO. —Bkell (talk) 13:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only pull up the obituary as well [8]. Published some papers, but this was before h-factors were a thing, so I don't think we can prove academic notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luca Ariatti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No sources beyond profiles from databases and short mentions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per @RossEvans19, is a professional footballer who has played significantly in the Italian top flight. Yes, this is a poorly sourced article, but do a WP:BEFORE search. I guarantee that there are sources. Also -- clear pass of Wikipedia:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. This article definitely needs to be improved, but deletion is completely unwarranted. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - He played for Atalanta, Fiorentina, Lecce and Chievo in the Serie A and has over 150 appearances in his career [9] - There's some sources on the Italian wiki too. RossEvans19 (talk) 15:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because he played many times does not make him notable. Also, 80% of the sources about him on the Italian wiki do not open for me for some reason, so i dont know what to say about them WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 15:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Are you too lazy to look at his Italian wiki? it:Luca Ariatti, there are sources about. Govvy (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Italian wiki sources, but article needs improvement. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Julián Muñoz (alpine skier)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find anything about this person. The only sources i was able to find are about 2 other people named Julian Munoz, one from Spain and other from Columbia. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Costa Rica. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pillows (snack)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable snack. A before search only yield passing mention. The closest being this Buzzfeed article that has one sentence about it. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Philippines. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no substantive coverage Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moe-phobia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is pretty much the same pushing of fringe ideas as human-oriented sexualism which i nominated in 2024. The creator Gruebleener seems to be a single-purpose account as they have made pretty much no other edits since that deletion discussion except creating this recently. This is WP:COATRACK for the fictosexuality article and I don't see anything here worth merging, it's all fringe activist nonsense. ★Trekker (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A quick look at the Japanese wiki. I see that this article is a verbatim translation and unattributed translation of ja:萌えフォビア. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meher Pudumjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businesswoman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thermax

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources, whether on or off Wikipedia, should be viewed with caution, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like announcing annual/quarterly results, joint ventures, capacity expansion news etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*astTECS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. Furthermore, the WP:BEFORE check has failed. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Karnataka. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ID Medical

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. The article lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources (e.g., reputable news, academic coverage) to demonstrate notability. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, United Kingdom, and England. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Medicine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaica at the 2018 Athletics World Cup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2018 Athletics World Cup was a weekend event. If you click it, you can see that the page summarizes every single result. I therefore don't see the point of a nation-by-nation rundown. Contrary, it's excessive and violates WP:NOTSTATS. There is no point in redirecting either. Hopefully, we will get no more of these, and fortunately, the Category:Nations at the Athletics World Cup only contains a set from this one year, and it's time to clean it out. I am therefore bundling all of them:

Geschichte (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sport of athletics and Jamaica. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Black Hat Hackers

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Notability criteria. It may have gone viral in some Bangladeshi media at one point, but even then it wasn't notable in any way, and it certainly isn't now. Somajyoti ✉ 10:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Internet, and Bangladesh. Somajyoti ✉ 10:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No actual case has been made why the sourcing is insufficient. Coverage contributes to notability, and notability doesn't expire, unlike what the nominator claims. Cortador (talk) 15:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cortador's statement is correct. Macarius Ibne Mito (talk), 03:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cortador. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Logsdon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Not a single secondary source. All passing mentions. scope_creep^Talk 09:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widespread coverage of films she has directed and edited. Article just must be expanded. Thriley (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriley: I saw you working on to expand it, which is laudable. Do you have secondary coverage? It lot of seems to surface and no depth. WP:THREE will do. scope_creep^Talk 19:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think she meets notability per WP:AUTHOR: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work." The documentary films she has directed have received widespread coverage. I have not done a deep search for articles solely about Logsdon, but I think the coverage on her works makes that unnecessary for notability concerns. Thriley (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dabzee discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG and the one reference provided in the article does not cover the subject in depth https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/entertainment/music/malayalam/thallumaala-song-manavaalan-thug/amp_videoshow/93500395.cms Uncle Bash007 (talk) 09:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 09:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Lists, and Kerala. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Verdical Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 10:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the page pretty much sounds like a big advertisement. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1999 Indian general election in Pondicherry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:gng , wp:n Jabba550 (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. Shellwood (talk) 09:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment noting that the page started with just a link and has had more info put on however I had put the non-AfD tag on the page (The one that removes the page after 7 days of the tag being there) and the page creator removed it Jabba550 (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No case has been made why the existing sources are insufficient. Cortador (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fetch.AI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no sources and previous content was filled with non RS and self published sources and was partially written by someone who was paid for it.

As it currently stands, the article would need to be blanked in order to meet verifiability standards. Laura240406 (talk) 09:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can also see that similar articles about the company and CEO have been deleted on the simple Wikipedia:

simple:User_talk:桑斯春德 simple:User talk:Namaste8907

The site has also been deleted over there. Laura240406 (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Websites, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I also cannot find any reliable sources. Most are self-published or come from crypto sites, though I'm not sure if that fetch.ai is the same as this company. I don't think fetch is going to happen here.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doodle Kids

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NWEB and WP:GNG as a software application with hardly any coverage, let alone sustained coverage. Notability issues tagged since 2017. jolielover♥talk 09:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software. jolielover♥talk 09:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Scott Robinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:BLP1E. Should be redirected to List of longest prison sentences. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, and Oklahoma. Shellwood (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Alexandre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some videos of her have been added to "best video essays" list articles:

Otherwise I find passing mentions. Considering these articles don't cover Alexandre herself in much detail, I believe it would be best to either delete the article or else merge it into Nebula (streaming service) ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sexuality and gender, and Internet. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Link is a passing mention, Prospect is a passing mention, BFI is 2 sentences in a list of 181 videos, the Xtra article is written by Alexandre herself. Hyperallergic and The American Conservative appear to be the most in-depth sources available, and neither one goes into much detail. hinnk (talk) 20:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plant Addicts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Conducted search, company is not notable enough to meet WP:GNG /WP:NCORP. 4 current sources with 2 from paypal written as paypal marketing case studies. 1 in depth source that may be a RS, but it is difficult to tell. 1 passing mention in a referral marketing landing page hosted on the NBC news domain. i know you're a dog 08:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most searches are turning up promotional material from paypal sites. The medium article is the only other in-depth look at the company I can find, but since medium is self-published it is not reliable. Passing mentions in listicles about places to buy plants online are the only other mentions. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I couldn't find anything notable about this company. The article itself was leaning promotional to me at one point considering it literally said "It has integrated PayPal into its checkout system, allowing secure and flexible payment options." Limmidy (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This should not be kept up as the only sources I can find are promotional. Also one RS that briefly mentions them is hardly a source that a whole page should stand on otherwise there are lots of not notable pages that could be created. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any indication of notability on a WP:BEFORE. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Hartley

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think a great deal has changed since the previous AFD which I closed as G5, but was clearly going to end in delete otherwise. I'm unable to find any sources that come close to meeting WP:BIO and with an h-index of 10 it's unlikely that WP:PROF is met. SmartSE (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada. SmartSE (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appears to be notable enough with his media presence and recognition. Servite et contribuere (talk) 08:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid rationale. Where are the sources providing substantial, independent coverage? SmartSE (talk) 08:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt. Far WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. No GNG as few sources are independent of the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this current PhD student. I guess there could be a case for WP:NCREATIVE with the podcast, but I do not see the reviews or other signs of impact (anyway, that would tend to make a case for a redirect to an article on the podcast). No other notability is apparent; in particular, I am not impressed by inclusion in listicles. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Wikipedia:Notability (people) says :"Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources."

Hartley is recognised as "notably influential" within the realm of ideologies, extending beyond his biography as a subject of secondary sources. His contributions to various news outlets, along with his role in conducting interviews with contemporaries and prominent figures AND being interviewed by them for his research, underscore the significance of his work in the field

1. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-:inflation-canadian-government-borrowing-billions/

2.https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jon-hartley-trudeau-should-listen-to-elon-musk-on-productivity

3.https://conversableeconomist.com/2024/03/13/interview-with-stephen-levitt-my-career-and-why-im-retiring-from-academia/

4.https://capitalismandfreedom.substack.com/p/episode-28-steven-d-levitt-freakonomics

5.https://americancompass.org/critics-corner-with-jon-hartley/

6.https://johnbatchelor.substack.com/p/the-future-of-canada-with-jon-hartley

I created this page because I believed his information was fragmented across various sources on the internet, and it would be worthwhile to compile it all in one place on Wikipedia.

Another criterion under WP:NACADEMIC states that a subject must "have had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." This criterion seems to apply to Hartley, given the influence of his research published in journals such as...

1.Journal of Financial Economics https://static1.squarespace.com/static/568f03c8841abaff89043b9d/t/660506eb488a1777a90db94a/1711605484880/HartleyJermann_2024_JFE.pdf

2.Publications under Harvard Business School https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=67312

3.Publications under Economic Letters https://static1.squarespace.com/static/568f03c8841abaff89043b9d/t/63eabdb744edb5235541b0b1/1676328375934/HartleyEL2021.pdf

4.Publication under Jurnal of Urban economics https://static1.squarespace.com/static/568f03c8841abaff89043b9d/t/63eabcff916adf2105c011b0/1676328191950/GyourkoHartleyKrimmel_JUE_2021.pdf

Fenharrow (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics, California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree that this meets the 7th criteria of WP:NACADEMIC due to his publications in the Journal of Financial Economics and his appearances/contributions to mainstream media sources and think tanks. He seems to have been frequently interviewed by prominent institutions, the Wharton School as an example. This also seems to be notable since he has been covered in various RSes such as The Globe and Mail, National Post, and more. Lastly, there are lots of professors who have fewer or a similar amount of RSes, content, and notability and remain on Wikipedia and are not being nominated for deletion. Examples include but are not limited to Herman Clarence Nixon, Daniel Nugent, Thomas Sakmar, Avery Craven, James L. Fitzgerald, Lawrence M. Friedman, H. Gregg Lewis, Guy A. Marco, and more. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmanandan Diamonds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. Furthermore, the WP:BEFORE check has failed. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Gujarat. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laljibhai Patel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Gujarat. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have added a reference, but am not seeing significant coverage - I may be missing sources that are not in English, though. I am seeing references to what I think is another person of the same name, someone associated with the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, here and here. Tacyarg (talk) 08:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kushal N. Desai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. Also, simply being the grandson of an industrialist doesn't justify having a Wikipedia page. Notability cannot be inherited. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Gujarat. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Satoshi Yoshida

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Played 24 games, but career was very short and lacks significant coverage, including none in the Japanese Wikipedia. Geschichte (talk) 07:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 09:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I had a read of the Japanese wikipedia, I didn't see even enough there for modern standards for WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 09:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Koji Inada (footballer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Played few games and lacks significant coverage, including none in the Japanese Wikipedia. Geschichte (talk) 07:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 09:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slavic shamanism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research combined with nonsense. There is no such thing as "Slavic shamanism", no more than "Slavic druidism", "Slavic kabbalism", "Slavic voodooism", and so on, although one may concoct the corresponding texts with a bit of fantasy. All these terms are culture-specific and let them be so. --Altenmann >talk 06:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. "Baba Yaga's Book of Witchcraft" self-published by a tarot-reader as the main source of wisdom there? Really? Hold my beer. I have a couple of articles to write... --Altenmann >talk 06:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first reference (Gieysztor 2006) is available via Google, but the cited page does not contain anything substantial about Slavic shamanism. Delete, at least based on current sources. 84.251.164.143 (talk) 06:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ZTreeWin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nommed for PRODDEL in 2010 for "No evidence of notability. No references given." Tag removed. It's been 15 years and there's still no significant coverage. Article reads like an advertisement. Rcfische2 (talk) 05:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rcfische2 (talk) 05:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a renomination, previous AFD was Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Altap_Salamander. Rcfische2 (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete googling does not lead me to believe there is something notable here

Czarking0 (talk) 06:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unable to find WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. There's like a couple sentences in one PCMag issue and that's the best I could find. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 20:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free play (Derrida)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDICT and not WP:Notable. Derrida was a philosopher and polymath with countless neologisms to his credit and many other unique connotations to existing expressions. A few of these, like Différance have broken out and achieved notability and have been studied on their own terms way beyond passing mentions and do deserve an article, but this is not one of them. In addition, the entire article consists of two Derrida quotations. Suggest transwikify content to q:Derrida and perhaps redirect the page to one of these:

but honestly I don't which one. There is also Event (philosophy), but Derrida is not mentioned there; maybe Phlsph7 could help out with this one. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Philosophy. Mathglot (talk) 05:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

redirect I looked on Derrida and other than the link back to this article I don't see any mention of this concept even in the talk pages. If there is a meaningful difference between a neologism and a philosophical concept then I think this falls more in the latter camp. However, I would support redirecting this back to Derrida and if talk page consensus there suggests splitting it then it can be resurrected.

Czarking0 (talk) 06:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no merge/redirect , A couple of quotations which do not explain what the heck "freeplay" is. It appears there are no backlinks to the article which are not from Derrida's templates. So no evidence from secondary sources of the importance of this concept, neither in the wider philosophy, nor in the "Derrida Universe". So I see no need to clutter Derrida's bio. --Altenmann >talk 06:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
no transwiki to quote: no reason. Just as well you may transquote the whole book. Only for the quotes which some RS deemed notable it makes sense to transquote. --Altenmann >talk 09:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
comment: @Mathglot: thanks for the ping! I'm not sure how to best handle this type of case. It's not Derrida's most influential concept, but there are some secondary sources, like [10] and [11]. I don't know whether they are sufficient to justify have a separate article rather than including the discussion in a parent article on Derrida or Derrida's philosophy. Maybe in principle, one could make an argument for notability. However, the current content, consisting of a minimal explanation and two quotes, does not really justify a separate article. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Outside the whole framework, the current article pretty much incomprehensible. Extensive cherry-picked quotes are of no help, because Derrida's writings are not for feeble minds. --Altenmann >talk 08:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  A bit o/t, but I couldn't help adding that whenever I read (or try to read) Derrida (not very often), I can't decide if I have a feeble mind, or he does. Mathglot (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge first paragraph into Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences and get rid of the gratuitous quotation. Not enough secondary coverage to warrant a separate article. -insert valid name here- (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cocaine Nose (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Music (Playboi Carti album). Almost all the sources discuss this song in the context of the Music album or a series of concert performances. Only The Face talks about the song as its own thing. Not enough for WP:GNG. Binksternet (talk) 04:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Binksternet (talk) 04:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure it charted in other territories too, not just the whole continent. (North America) EternalBaile (talk) 14:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And literally every track from the album that has its own article, uses the same references and those references are mainly about the songs only in the context of the Music album. EternalBaile (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. GoldRomean (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For example "Trim". EternalBaile (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cummings-Grady, Mackenzie (March 14, 2025). "Playboi Carti's 'MUSIC': All Guest Features Ranked". Billboard. Retrieved 31 March 2025.
^ Diaz, Angel; Saponara, Michael (March 14, 2025). "Every Song From Playboi Carti's 'Music' Album Ranked: Critic's Picks". Billboard. Retrieved 31 March 2025.
^ Beaumont-Thomas, Ben (2025-03-17). "Playboi Carti: Music review – the most anticipated rap album this decade was worth the wait". The Guardian. Retrieved 2025-03-31.
^ Eede, Christian (28 March 2025). "Playboi Carti – MUSIC". The Quietus. Retrieved 31 March 2025.

EternalBaile (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually the only article with a reference that is only entirely for a song and not the album. EternalBaile (talk) 16:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. EternalBaile (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And at least the song is mentioned in the reviews unlike many of the other songs in the album. EternalBaile (talk) 03:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant coverage by reliable sources. This [12] (note the "source=chatgpt.com" in the URL) was probably the only source mentioned in the article about the actual song primarily. GoldRomean (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:V and WP:NSONG per wide coverage met. Some reliable sources are already added here and more are available. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 04:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 05:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Here is another source

Czarking0 (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WDNZ-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More OR slop from User:K-Johnson 127; non-notable LPTV. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kentucky. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into WNKY. It’s a non-notable LPTV that’s better off going the way of WLHA-LD or KCWL-LD at best. (I copy&pasted this but it still works) --Danubeball

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Sources do not establish notability. Also nashvilledtvnews.info is a user generated content site. I question all the other places it is used on WP

Czarking0 (talk) 06:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge infobox and channel map, and technical details to WNKY Station existed as a license only by companies with no interest in actually broadcasting until 2019, when outside a little-watched 'TV on radio' simulcast that probably didn't even have WKCT as a viewer itself and someone plugging in the newspaper's daily YouTube video playlist into VLC to provide local news, it just carried a 'bouncing ball' mix of Antenna/MyNet and Biz TV content as a 'run for fun' station until Marquee bought it, professionalized it and programmed it as a WNKY extension. Not really a lot here and just a lot of fat (especially the details about WHAS 'interference', which if you know the rules of LPTV, it has to accept that interference no matter what anyways, and more care about Antenna TV's fate in the market than should be spent by an average person). A section about the technical details of WNKY-LD and WDNZ-LD is appropriate, but in a much reduced form. Nathannah • 📮 20:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WNKY-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More OR slop from User:K-Johnson 127; at least one self-published source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kentucky. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into WNKY. It’s a non-notable LPTV that’s better off going the way of WLHA-LD or KCWL-LD at best. --Danubeball (talk) 00:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge infobox and channel map, and technical details to WNKY King Forward is a group that has never built out a serious TV station, so most of its history has been under Marquee as a testing translator to make sure everything worked (the main WNKY is on UHF on the same tower so it just duplicated the station at a lower power during its tests), then as an extended sister station to carry Ion and Weigel networks, outside Defy I getting replaced with Ion Plus as expected when that change was made, though under the ownership of a competent broadcaster rather than all automated by Innovate/HC2. A section about the technical details of WNKY-LD and WDNZ-LD is appropriate, but in a much reduced form. Nathannah • 📮 20:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Godfrey

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Everything is related to his claims of once seeing a UFO. A standard WP:BEFORE fails to find any other point of notability. Fails WP:BLP1E. Chetsford (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, this should have been speedily deleted. For transparency and to avoid bookkeeping chaos, I'll defer to someone else to close this. Sorry. Chetsford (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Paranormal, Police, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of unused sources available to support notability, including [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. It just needs a {{more citations needed}} template at top, per WP:ATD. I'd say it passes WP:BLP1E. 5Q5|^✉ 12:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is Sky History (the first linked source) the same as the History Channel? If so It might not be reliable, as explained at WP:RSPHISTORY. Bonus Person (talk) 13:44, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unclear how it passes BLP1E if every piece of the scattered coverage relates to his supposed abduction? Indeed, this was the point raised by User:Grim23 and User:LuckyLouie in the first AfD (which closed as delete and which this article seems to be a carbon copy recreation of). Chetsford (talk) 08:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per comments of 5Q5 Servite et contribuere (talk) 08:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meditopia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely promotional and fails WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 01:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Companies, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:ILIKEIT, but it doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Sources are routine announcements, funding, etc. Nothing I find meets WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the newly added references?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve trimmed the article significantly to take out anything that sounded promotional or was just routine info. What’s left is backed by solid, independent sources like TechCrunch, Forbes, and Deloitte, which offer real coverage that meets notability guidelines WP:NCORP / WP:ORGCRIT. I think the article should stay, and I’m totally open to improving it further with help from other editors. Hariseldon42 (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even with the trimmed-down version with less promotional material, I do not believe meditopia meets WP:NORG or WP:GNG. Current sources are not covering the app/company in detail; most are simply routine coverage of business investments in business-focused papers/journals. As a company itself I don't think Deloitte is independent here. A further search for sources returns much of the same. Unless someone can identify reliable secondary sources with in-depth coverage of meditopia that is not reliant on executive interviews then this article should be deleted.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haveli Investments

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sourced to funding and acquisition announcements, which are typically not counted toward notability per WP:ORGTRIV. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, United States of America, and Texas. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree this fails GNG and NCORP guidelines. Most coverage is about acquisitions as stated in the nomination. It's a relatively young company (founded 2022) so I doubt we're missing something in older offline sources. As of now, I have not found any in-depth coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 11:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Redirect to ZeroFox, or merge ZeroFox into this article, but do not delete page history. --Jax 0677 (talk)

Kunerth's algorithm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason

The first reason I believe the page should be removed is non-notability. There are only two non-forum references I can find not written by the Wikipedia article's creator and main contributor about Kunerth's algorithm. (Both references are listed in the Wikipedia article.) The first is the original 1878 paper by Kunerth^[1]. It is written in German, a language neither me nor the article's creator can read (as they admitted in the talk page). The second reference is a 1920 textbook^[2]. The reference to Kunerth's algorithm in the textbook is fairly short (shorter than the body of the article), and is mostly just a restatement and very terse summary of Kunerth's original paper, with no proofs. In my opinion, an algorithm that finds modular square roots isn't notable on its own anymore because there already multiple, well known algorithms the solve the modular square root problem. (There are four Wikipedia articles on different algorithms that solve the problem.) Admittedly, the claim that $N$ doesn't need to be factored is different from the other algorithms, and may warrant notability. However, the 1920 textbook directly contradicts this claim (it states that $N$ must be prime). So, there seems to be only two relevant references to Kunerth's algorithm, one written in a language neither I nor the article's creator can read, and the other which directly contradicts one of the main claims in the article.

The second reason I'm nominating this Wikipedia page for deletion is because the most of the page is incomprehensible, low quality, and probably not correct. The algorithm as written does not work. There are many variables that aren't defined. (For example, what are $A$ and $C$ ?). As noted before me on the talk page, it seems like $w$ can be anything. There is no indication as to how the algorithm works when a square root doesn't exist (i.e., if there are no solutions $y$ to the congruence $y^{2}\equiv B\mod N$ ). There is no attempt at a proof of correctness, or even an attempt to explain why the algorithm works. While the main contributor has posted many examples of Mathematica I/O (input/output) on the talk page, there seems to be no code (pseduo or otherwise) that actually implements the algorithm in general. Two other user before me also had concerns about the algorithm presented in the article, and in neither case, were these concerns resolved by the article's main contributor.

Most of the concerns addressed in the previous paragraph could theoretically be addressed and fixed. However, as stated in the first paragraph, I don't believe that Kunerth's algorithm is notable enough and too few references on the topic seems to be available. Obviously, I don't feel comfortable fixing the article unless other references on Kunerth's algorithm are found, due to the language barrier of the original paper and the lack of other English references. Regardless, the state of the current article needs to be addressed.

For more context, see the discussion I started on it's talk page: Talk:Kunerth's_algorithm#This_article_should_be_deleted. Also, here is another user attempting to understand the algorithm presented directly on the main contributor's talk page: User_talk:Endo999#A_question_about_Kunerth’s_algorithm_on_how_to_get_several_square_root_for_the_same_square….

Also, as a disclaimer. I'm not an active Wikipedia contributor, so I welcome any feedback about my approach to nominating an article for deletion. byhill (talk) 04:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Adolf Kunerth, "Sitzungsberichte. Academie Der Wissenschaften" vol 78(2), 1878, p 327-346, url="https://pdfhost.io/v/~OwxzpPNA_KUNERTH_1878" retrieved="30/05/2025"
^ Leonard Eugene Dickson, "History of Numbers", vol 2, pp. 383–384.

The article is noteable as it has two pages devoted to it in the 1920 History of Numbers by Leonard Dickson, who was the premiere American mathematician between 1900 and 1950. Saying that Dickson's reference is 100 years old is like saying that Dante wrote in 1300 and his thought does not reflect Catholic church dogma. It does and so similarly is Dickson's expertise in Number theory (1920) to be respected. Endo999 (talk) 04:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Kunerth modular square root algorithm is notable as it is the only one I know of that manages to find the square root of a number without factoring the

modulus. For that alone it is notable. The algorithm substitutes the requirement that a quadratic equation must be solved for the need to factor the modulus. It can do this for modula that cannot be factored. Endo999 (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Dickson source talks only about prime moduli. If you know that the modulus is prime you know its prime factorization. So there is no avoidance of factoring. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't how you come to the conclusion that $N$ does not need to be factored. Dickson contradicts this claim. While I can't read Kunerth's paper due to language barriers, all the examples in the paper use prime moduli. The claim that $N$ doesn't need to be factored needs to be backed up.

Additionally, the integer factorization problem is equivalent to finding modular square roots [20]. So if Kunerth's algorithm doesn't require $N$ to be factored, then it must solve an equally difficult problem. byhill (talk) 16:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kunerth's method does not require factorisation of the modulus. I've tested this on the TALK page where I factor 5 for the modulus

1+RSA260^4+18*RSA260^2, a modulus that cannot be factored by current means. Endo999 (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[[21]]. In fact Kunerth's method can take the modular square root of 5 for any modulus of the formula 1+x^4+18*x^2. Endo999 (talk) 20:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment here is further evidence that this article is in irrecoverable violation of WP:OR and WP:V. --JBL (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is this original research or just agile use of the existing modular square root algorithm. Endo999 (talk) 20:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So agile that no one else can see how it relates to anything in any reliable source .... --JBL (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Those pages of Dickson are readable here: [22]. Reading them, it becomes obvious that Kunerth's work is primarily about finding integer solutions $(x,y)$ to the quadratic equation $y^{2}=ax^{2}+bx+c$ . Modular square roots, for prime moduli only, are mentioned in one paragraph as a special case of this method for $a=0$ and modulus $b$ . It does not really support the case made by our article that something called "Kunerth's algorithm" is a general method for finding modular square roots, and having a single secondary source on this method (whatever the method actually is determined to be) is not enough for WP:GNG-based notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per byhill and Eppstein. Also, looking on the talk page of the article, it appears, that the editor wrote a computer implementation, made some tests, and tried to (poorly) describe their implementation in this article. This is WP:Original research, and does not belong to Wikipedia. D.Lazard (talk) 08:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the compelling nomination; this article appears to be an unintentional hoax. --JBL (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and discussion. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HackMiami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not seem to be notable upon search - no reliable, secondary sources can be found. PROD was proposed & contested in the past for the same reason, so AfD is the only course of action available here. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Technology, and Florida. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there has been some secondary coverage, most notably, Forbes and The Rolling Stone, but the article's tone should be improved. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1980 Wigtown District Council election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly completely uncontested election that I could not find substantitive info on through searches, only vague references. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Seemingly completely uncontested election"? Some of the wards were contested, just not by members of a formal political party, only by independents. Having only independents standing was pretty common in rural areas in Scotland throughout this time period. Perhaps ward results could be added to indicate that some wards were contested.

I understand there is limited sources available, but https://www.electionscentre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Scottish-District-Elections-1980.pdfcontains the results to the election. Probably also included in regional/national newspapers of the time but, alas, most archives are locked behind a paywall.

Therefore, I think it should be kept, unless you want to also delete most other Scottish local election pages, for rural areas, from after the reorganisation to ~1995. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is not presumed coverage for local elections of small municipality areas, especially uncontested ones Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regional newspapers would have something if not result coverage from the time. I managed to find coverage about Moray Council results from 1984, albeit Moray is larger. Obviously would take time to do this every page but would be possible. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1977 Wigtown District Council election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking to AfD over PROD because hard to find sources. I could not find anything from searches in this seemingly small district area. Rationale is a non-notable election in a local area Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Hard to find sources," such is the way with Scottish local elections. https://www.electionscentre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Scottish-District-Elections-1977.pdf contains the results to the election. As with the 1980 page, I guess ward results, or a newspaper article from the time could also be included. These elections, although small in electors, are very important to Scotland's political story, especially in rural areas. Scotland's rural areas have a history of voting for non-partisan local independents, that is only now being challenged. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 10:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should note I am willing to improve these pages, if that is what you are getting at... SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 10:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SpeysideWikipedian sources should indicate significant and lasting coverage, which is important with local elections more than anything. Not every small election necessarily deserves a page. Feel free to improve the article with coverage that shows that, but primary sources with only results would not count towards that. This applies to your comment on the other AfD too Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still, I do not think that is a valid reason to delete this page. Leave the page up and myself and others can improve them. Leave it with a needs sources tag and people such as @Stevie fae Scotland will help improve them I'm sure. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I was to improve every pre 1995 local election page with a similar structure + ward results + newspaper/article as 1974 Tweeddale District Council election would that be sufficient? SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not even that page shows significant coverage meeting GNG in my opinion Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, work needs done for every page is what I am saying, this is a large project. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

my argument is not every one of these small elections deserves a page. They could also be merged into a wider local election page Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting thought. Where would you draw the line though? Does each Glaswegian council election deserve its own page just because more people happen to live in Glasgow? How would such a move to a single page be implemented? SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a precedent for this elsewhere? If the only way these results can be preserved on the wiki is for a mass merger to happen then surely there is an example from another country perhaps? SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps also a wider discussion amongst other local election editors is needed too. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure of other precedent, but it is a solution since these small elections are seemingly not notable on their own. Going on WP:NOTDATABASE, just because there are results available for something, does not mean that it deserves a page of it's own. A merge to a page for elections, in this case to a 1977 Scottish local elections in Dumfries and Galloway page would potentially establish notability for all these elections as a whole Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would need more input from others before deciding. If that is the way to establish notability I am happy to merge lesser notable pages into a regional district results page. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties of the 2011 Super Outbreak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the outbreak is very notable, this article was initially denied at AfC based on WP:NOTMEMORIAL and was later published into the mainspace anyway. The article contains several errors (such as stating the Hackleburg tornado killed 72 people but only listing 70), and the table at the top does not add up to the correct number of people killed on the correct dates. The top table also does not seem to jive with the list of fatalities below it in regards to the date. The table also lists numerous Jane and John Doe's, implying that those people are unknown. In fact, those people are known, but likely do not have names published online in an easily found place. I believe an alternative to outright deletion could be to condense this into a section at 2011 Super Outbreak or to break the names (provided the information is correct) into separate tables in their respective tornado's section at 2011 Super Outbreak. United States Man (talk) 22:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NOTMEMORIAL only applies to non-notable casualty lists, which isn’t the case here. Other than that, nothing said warrants deletion. Instead of immediately sending it to AfD, be bold and fix it. E_F⁵ 23:57, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I have a computer, an in-depth reasoning:
1. The Teahouse decline is moot since I published it after another experienced user told me it was fine.
2. NOTMEMORIAL only applies to deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such requirements. Note that every person on the list has had some form of coverage, and as such does not fall under NOTMEMORIAL.
3. This is far from a WP:TNT situation needing the deletion of a large list. Slap a {{cleanup|reason=Missing people in the list}} tag instead of immediately taking it to AfD, or you can one-up that and actually fix the issue.
4. The table also lists numerous Jane and John Doe's, implying that those people are unknown and he table at the top does not add up to the correct number of people killed on the correct dates aren't policy-based and don't hold weight. — E_F⁵ 12:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a pretty cut and dry case of WP:NOTMEMORIAL as well as WP:NOTDATABASE (I read the above arguments about this not being a case of NOTMEMORIAL, but I'm unconvinced). I understand that they can all be sourced, but the vast, vast majority of this list is simply a reprint of two news articles listing the names of the deceased. I suppose you could make an argument that these could be broken out into sections on the individual tornado pages. nf utvol (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This page is not encyclopedic. There are many, many, many catastrophes in the world. And Wikipedia isn't the place to memorialize everyone. Angryapathy (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yeah, while the wording of NOTMEMORIAL might not exactly match this, I think the intent does. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is sad, but unfortunately it falls under the NOTMEMORIAL clause of "others who do not meet such [notability] requirements". Geschichte (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, strong merge per all above. I like the nominator's alternative of having this be a section on 2011 Super Outbreak over straight-up removal from the site. Departure– (talk) 20:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have clear consensus for "this article shouldn't exist". Relisting to check if there is any more support for a merge rather than outright deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge definitely as no one is favoring keeping it, apart from one vote. This article is consisting detailed post-event details, part of a causing event which has it's own independent article. The casualties and the event itself are two different things and enough coverage with passable mentions. I will include some news articles here with casualties and losses mentioned but there are tens of more such independent sources. Some might be on the article or mentioned but these are from a simple google search - [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Combined of them and many more sources with moderate analysis are enough to keep the article but again, just to keep it WP:ATD, merge.HilssaMansen19 (talk) 03:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Partial merge into 2011 Super Outbreak. Articles that are lists of fatalities of an event are very rare on Wikipedia — the only comparable article I can think of is Lists of victims of the September 11 attacks, but in that instance, which has been discussed before, the list itself is very notable. In this case I'm not seeing that kind of coverage. The fatalities section should be placed into the article as-is. The deaths referenced by individual sources should be put into their respective tornadoes' subsections in the "Confirmed tornadoes" section, and the large AL list can be added as an external link. -insert valid name here- (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First Bosniak Gymnasium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AI written article about a secondary school with no indication of notability. A possible ATD is merge to Petrakijina Street. JTtheOG (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. JTtheOG (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Falanghe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically this was WP:BLARed by Pppery back in 2024 and reverted by the creator, so I'm here instead of BLARing again.

Fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Not independently notable of Kerbal Space Program, effectively no information not already at Kerbal Space Program#Pre-development. ~ A412 ^talk! 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and Brazil. ~ A412 ^talk! 02:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kerbal Space Program per WP:NPERSON being failed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Mapandan local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No cited sources cover the election at much length, and was not able to find much through searching. Election for small municipality of under 40,000, and relies on social media sources Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Mapandan local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local election for municipality of under 40,000. Sources are primary and no significant coverage Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No coverage about this. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Marlborough, Massachusetts mayoral election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article consists of local news outlets and social media posts exclusively. No sort of state-wide coverage sources that would make this notable Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Marlborough is too small for its mayor to be presumptively notable under WP:POLITICIAN. Individual mayoral elections fall well below the bar. Ravenswing 04:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Small-city elections are almost never notable. Unless there are truly unusual events, they don't receive substantial coverage, just run-of-the-mill coverage in local sources. They also don't tend to have sustained coverage. This election does not seem to be an exception from these general rules. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This seems to fall short of notability. If every single mayor election from every town is included, this will create page bloat. Unless there is something particularly special or notable about this election, it shouldn't be included. Also, there are not a lot of prominent RSes talking about this election either. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Safari Motel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Motel that fails WP:SIGCOV, there are plenty of old motels in Las Vegas, as well as homeless shelters, a lot of which do not get their own articles. The motel is mostly too local to merit SIGCOV, which the only notable event to happen was the conversion to a homeless shelter. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:17, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)#Engineered constructs says:
Buildings, including private residences, transportation facilities and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.

Sources
1. Glionna, John M. (2017-04-22). "Motel, once a haven, now a crime-ridden jungle in downtown Las Vegas". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Audience says, "The source's audience must also be considered. Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least regional audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability." The motel received significant coverage in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which is the "the largest circulating daily newspaper in Nevada", so the audience requirement is met.
  The article notes: "In the 1950s, the Safari was part of the face of downtown Las Vegas, joining other area motels to lure tourists with its spacious rooms and rectangular neon-lit marquee. First opened in 1954, the motel was registered with Automobile Club of America, which vouched for its quality. Postcard advertisements boasted of “Beautiful, Carpeted 1-2 Bedroom Units. Smartly furnished for your comfort, with TV, Radio. Cooled by refrigeration, tiled tub and showers, heated swimming pool with large cabana & large shaded lawn area for lounging.” The Safari helped provide the allure to the East Fremont Street corridor, the city’s own version of old Route 66 and part of the original route to Los Angeles before Highway 91 — the precursor to Interstate 15 — was built in the mid-1920s."
  The article notes: "Meanwhile, they were summoned to the smaller 21-room Safari on 172 occasions — more than twice that of any other property, according to Metro. ... Police, fire and health departments and the city attorney are working to shutter the motel and perhaps seize the property. Two lawsuits filed in state and municipal courts label the Safari as a “chronic nuisance” — a haven for crime and hopeless rabbit hole for the time and energies of health and public safety officials. Authorities targeted the Safari soon after the drug-related slaying last April. They waged drug and prostitution operations, served search warrants and increased health inspections."
2. Johnson, Shea (2019-09-04). "Las Vegas will help convert troubled downtown motel to apartments". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "Las Vegas officials will contribute $95,000 in redevelopment agency funds to convert a vacant downtown motel with a troubled recent history into a 21-unit apartment complex. ... The issues with Safari Motel before it ceased operations in May were well documented: violent crime, drug use and health violations. Since 2006, officials opened 11 code enforcement cases, according to the city. There have been three fires at the property in the last five years. The new owner, 2001 Fremont LLC, bought the old motel for $950,000 on May 31, Clark County property records show. The company then requested Las Vegas assist with the motel’s conversion to market rate apartments and agreed to renovate the historic neon “Safari” sign to its original condition, according to the city."
3. Torres-Cortez, Ricardo (2022-10-14). "Careworn Safari Motel gets new life as transitional housing". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "The vintage Safari Motel in downtown Las Vegas has undergone various incarnations since it was first built nearly seven decades ago, when Clark County’s population hovered around 60,000. Long a tourist attraction, the relic of a bygone era has transformed into apartment living, been shuttered, caught fire multiple times and been labeled as a “chronic nuisance” where illegal activities abounded in recent years."
4. Pearson, Paul (2024-04-06). "Ex-motel gets new mission: Helping the homeless". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "An old motel in downtown Las Vegas is getting a new lease on life. The former Safari Motel on East Fremont Street has been turned into bridge housing for people experiencing homelessness. A ribbon-cutting ceremony was held Thursday morning for the site, which has been rechristened as a BETterment Community through a public-private partnership between Clark County, the City of Las Vegas, private companies and the nonprofit U.S. Vets. ... Built in 1956, the Safari had fallen on hard times in recent years. After a maintenance man was fatally shot there in 2016, and Las Vegas police officers served four drug search warrants in early 2017, a judge allowed the city to close the motel in the fall of 2017."
5. Richards, Rochelle (2017-04-23). "Las Vegas morning update for Sunday, April 23rd – Video". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "The Safari Motel, known as the most dangerous hotel in all of Las Vegas, used to be a popular tourist spot. Now it’s a crime trap the city wants to close down. According to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, officers have been called to the 21-room Safari on 172 occasions since March 2016. Police, fire and health departments along with the city attorney are now working to shut down the motel, and perhaps seize the property."
6. Kane, Arthur (2020-06-11). "Police called Alpine the worst of the worst' and tried to close it. Las Vegas officials said no". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "While the Alpine escaped closure as a chronic nuisance, around the same time and a mile away city officials were cracking down on the Safari Motel. A maintenance man was fatally shot there in April 2016, and Metro officers served drug search warrants on four different rooms in early 2017. ... A judge allowed the city to close the Safari in the fall of 2017. In May 2019, Yeh sold the property to an LLC based in Beverly Hills, California, for $950,000, records show."
7. Wilson, Miranda (2019-09-04). "Old downtown Las Vegas motel to be converted into apartments". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "A shuttered 1950s-era motel with a troubled history is the latest downtown property slated for redevelopment into apartments. Las Vegas Apartments LLC will convert the former Safari Motel on East Fremont Street into a 21-unit apartment complex with financial assistance from the city of Las Vegas. ... Built in 1956, the 25-unit Safari Motel had a notorious history in recent years. A man was stabbed in one of the rooms in 2016. A fire broke out in 2013, causing $25,000 in damage, displacing the manager and killing a dog. The city described it as a “blighted and crime-ridden property” in documents."
8. Miller, Shannon (2023-04-20). "Public-private partnerships transform an old Downtown motel into transitional housing". Las Vegas Weekly. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "On one of the first warm mornings this spring, Clark County officials hosted a ribbon cutting at the site of the former Safari Motel on Fremont Street—now a bridge housing complex that provides supportive services for 50 clients at a time, or up to 184 homeless adults per year. ... Since opening in late February, the complex has served more than 20 clients, according to staff. ... The renovated motel provides a unique Vegas vibe and includes wheelchair-accessible rooms, laundry machines and a spacious courtyard with a zen garden donated by the Venetian. Each room includes a bed, closet, bathroom and kitchen equipped with a refrigerator and appliances."
9. Jaramillo, Sally (2019-09-10). "Safari Motel to be transformed into modern apartment complex". KLAS-TV. Archived from the original on 2019-09-13. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
  The article notes: "“Project Enchilada:” It sounds like it has to do with Mexican food, but it’s actually the master plan that was adopted by the City of Las Vegas back in 2016. Project Enchilada aims to bring redevelopment to the Fremont East area. One of the projects involves the Safari Motel. The old downtown Las Vegas motel was built in 1956, but now it’s going to be converted into a 21 unit apartment complex thanks to approval from the Las Vegas City Council."
10. "Authorities close motel after numerous code violations found". Las Vegas Review-Journal. 1991-02-23. Factiva lvgs000020020430dn2n0031o.
  The article notes: " Las Vegas police and city health, building and fire inspectors shut down a Fremont Street motel Friday after finding numerous code violations.Police said they found 14 children among the residents living in squalid conditions at the Safari Motel at 2001 E. Fremont St. near 21st Street.Officers of the North Area Police Station's Community Policing Team said in one month there were about 45 calls for police to the motel, most of them dealing with narcotics and prostitution.For three hours Friday, police and city health, building and fire inspectors looked through the motel's 20 rooms. Police said they found open wires, unsafe floors, makeshift sinks, human feces in alleyways, soiled pillows and urine-stained mattresses with burn holes."
11. Less significant coverage:
  1. Cling, Carol (2000-03-06). "Wayne Newton pitches Miller Lite in commercial". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Factiva LVGS000020010808dw36003d8.
    The article notes: "Further east on Fremont Street, near the Safari Motel, is one of the planned locations for a series of 15-second TV commercials promoting the 2000 census in Southern Nevada. The spots are scheduled to shoot Thursday through Saturday at locations including the Desert Shores area an an area near Spring Mountain Road and Arville Street, according to Lynn Purdue, senior vice president of Puckett Advertising, which created the multimedia campaign to encourage participation in the 2000 census "and educate people about what the census is for.""
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Safari Motel to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To evaluate sourcing Cunard identified
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lean keep Per sources found by @Cunard. I would be more confident about keeping if sources more focused on its history were available/noted as well.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources found by cunard which seem to be reliable it meets sustained as well as the sources span multiple years and stories and provides a background of the motel as it was in the 50s Scooby453w (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and lacks evidence of WP:SUSTAINED notability backed up by WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Entirely lacks WP:INDEPENDENT sources - all 22 are either press releases or short descriptions from affiliate websites. Tvfunhouse (talk) 03:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The current article and its sources are absolutely garbage, but secondary sources do exist. [33][34][35] Gonna do some more research before !voting though – if I can find the time I'd like to improve the article too. Toadspike [Talk] 17:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Software, and Switzerland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SciChart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely promotional and fails WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 01:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Science, Medicine, Software, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:ORGSIG due to the lack of reliable independent sources. The only source covering the company is GlobeNewswire, and its article has numerous issues and reads like an advertorial. The content is filled with "peacock-like" language and cites the company itself as a source. — Staniulis^TALK 08:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not finding any significant coverage of the company or its product. Available material is largely promotional.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 20:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Next Trinidad and Tobago general election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. The election won't take place for another 5 years; we don't even know who the candidates are. Obviously can't find any sources talking about this upcoming election. ApexParagon (talk) 01:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no coverage at all. Definitely too soon Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:00, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Trinidad and Tobago. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definately WP:TOOSOON, and absolutely no sources or WP:SIGCOV as of now. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This seems to be WP:TOOSOON, there are no links at all, it is a sentence long and that one sentence states that the election will not be in another five years. Maybe once there are sources to support it to bolster its notability it can be put on but this would be like giving the 2038 U.S. election a page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 14:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Marilao local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find anything through searches for Marilao 2025 elections, lots of social media posts and that is about it. Found page while going through NPP backlog Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 21:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bypass Paywalls Clean

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG states that multiple sources is needed for reliability. Per WP:RSP, TorrentFreak counts towards reliability. Neither Gigazine or Xakep have coverage on en wikipedia or WP:RSP. I translated articles from both sources and find they essentially rereport TorrentFreak's findings or offer tutorials. Felt borderline so I wanted to open the discussion. Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 00:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Piracy, Internet, and Software. Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 00:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The perennial sources list (WP:RSP) is not a comprehensive list of every reliable source in existence, and the reliable sources guideline (WP:RS) does not require a source to have an English Wikipedia article before it can be considered reliable. Gigazine (see jp:GIGAZINE) is a Japanese technology news website founded in 2000, and Xakep (see ru:Хакер (журнал)) is a Russian information security magazine founded in 1999. Both of these publications are established in their fields and can be learned about by reading Wikipedia articles in their respective native languages; I note the latter for your convenience, as the existence of Wikipedia articles do not confer reliability.
In this article, five citations from three reliable sources are cited, excluding the GitFlic repository page:

Source assessment table prepared by User:Newslinger
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://torrentfreak.com/bypass-paywalls-clean-shut-down-for-dmca-anti-circumvention-violations-240820/	No evidence of affiliation with article subject	TorrentFreak is generally reliable, per WP:RSP § TorrentFreak	Word count of 940 in a source that fully focuses on the article subject meets significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) requirement	✔ Yes
https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20220101-bypass-paywalls-clean/	No evidence of affiliation with article subject	Japanese technology publication founded in 2000, per jp:GIGAZINE. WP:RS does not disqualify tutorials from being reliable sources.	Word count of 455 in a source that fully focuses on the article subject meets WP:SIGCOV	✔ Yes
https://torrentfreak.com/dmca-targetting-bypass-paywalls-clean-isnt-what-people-should-be-angry-about-240414/	TorrentFreak has already been listed in this table	Per above	Word count of 979 in a source that analyzes an event in the article subject's history is enough to establish WP:SIGCOV	✘ No
https://xakep.ru/2024/08/22/bpc-github/	No evidence of affiliation with article subject	Russian information security publication founded in 1999, per ru:Хакер (журнал)	Word count of 528 in a source that fully focuses on the article subject meets WP:SIGCOV	✔ Yes
https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20230215-mozilla-removes-bypass-paywalls-clean-extension	Gigazine has already been listed in this table	Per above	~ Word count of 379 in a source that fully focuses on the article subject arguably meets WP:SIGCOV, but I am marking this as "partial" out of an abundance of caution	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Per the above source assessment table, three cited sources count toward the general notability guideline (WP:GNG, and is sufficient to meet the guideline requirements. The sources cover the functionality of the article subject, as well as three distinct controversies in the article subject's history (2023 Add-ons for Firefox removal, 2024 GitLab removal, and 2024 GitHub removal). — Newslinger talk 06:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above, RSP is not a comprehensive list. See WP:RSPMISSING Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 13:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: TorrentFreak and Xakep seem like good sources offering significant coverage. WP:RSPSS is for sources that have been discussed multiple times by the community and isn't the end all be all. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 21:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The Flying Wedge Award

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see any sigcov for this award. GoldRomean (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards, Sports, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-ington

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Move to Wiktionary - dicdef with list. Compare wikt:-ton#Derived terms --Altenmann >talk 00:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wiktionary per nom.

ApexParagon (talk) 01:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wiktionary — Maile (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Lists, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mircea Geoană 2024 presidential campaign

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Campaign page for a candidate who got just over 5%, does not indicate standalone notability. Also covered more in-depth at his own article Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mircea_Geoană#2024_presidential_election. ApexParagon (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Romania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HighPoint

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, fails WP:NCORP. Half of the references are to the Al Jazeera News homepage or don't mention the article subject. Of the remainder, store opening announcements don't satisfy WP:ORGTRIV. There's one possibly acceptable magazine article, but it's nowhere near enough. ~ A412 ^talk! 00:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Saudi Arabia. ~ A412 ^talk! 00:35, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prajal Regmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regardless of how this turns out, thank you Flyingphoenixchips for the reminder about WP:ATD-T. For reference, the relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Notability (people). I think the only sources for this biography that have significant coverage (Honei, Vanguards of Wesea, SEED Cell, and iU) are either not independent or not reliable. Honei could be independent. I consider them to be basically human interest reporting, which is generally not as reliable as news reporting, and I don't see evidence of reliability (like editorial oversight) to refute that generalization. Vanguards of Wesea is – per its website – an initiative of the Wesean High School Students Forum. It looks like its stories are produced from nominations that are then assessed according to that website's definition of notability. Despite the nominations being reviewed by editors, I am skeptical of that source's independence from the subject. SEED Cell and the iU interview don't seem independent. In my search for sources, I only found newsheads.in. That source ended up on the spam blacklist, so I won't spend too much time evaluating it. Overall, I don't see evidence of notability. PrinceTortoise (he/him • poke) 23:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. PrinceTortoise (he/him • poke) 23:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Sikkim. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, deletion discussion would be the best course of action to get a consensus on notability! :) For now I have added the additional references! I am kinda on the grey area on whether the subject is fully notable or not either. However would appreciate input from other editors here. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 01:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I do agree with most of what PrinceTortoise had to say. https://www.iuemag.com/u20/is/an-inspiring-young-entrepreneur-from-the-northeast-india-Prajal-Regmi IU] is definitely not a reliable source. As for SEED Cell it seems reliable to me, because the article itself only reports of the person winning an award, and I do think this might be independent of the subject and is only reporting news about entrepreneurship from the state. As for Honei I defnitely am on the edge. Yes, it is definitely a case of human interest reporting. As for Vanguards of Wesea I do feel the subject is definitely independent from the article. There is a named author for each article, and from their website they state that "Vanguards of Wesea is strictly an encyclopedia... All nominations undergo thorough verification, and our editors ensure each person's notability through third-party sources and confirm that their achievements are legitimate." I do not see anything there that might show tht the subject is not independent from them. But again, yes, the editors listed all seems to be minors so the quality of journalism might be questioned. Not to seem ageist, but I would like to see what others have to say for the same. But yes, I myself have not been able to find any other sources apart from this. I think it just passes notability and will thus support a keep. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 06:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:12, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would welcome greater participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Next Sri Lankan presidential election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, election will probably take place in ~5 years, cannot find anything on the next election specifically. Not a language I speak so if someone who knows much about the language could see what they can find. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Sri Lanka. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete; as you mentioned, there aren't many sources about the election itself as it's just too far away, much WP:CRYSTAL vibes, but let's see what other editors think. Not Wlwtn (talk) 02:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article was originally titled "2029 Sri Lankan presidential election", but was renamed "Next Sri Lankan presidential election" following a discussion on the article's talk page. I wish to draw attention to the following deletion discussion and the comments made therein, for reference. The same principles apply to this article. Sri Lanka has held regular elections since gaining independence and regular presidential elections since the first in 1982. In this context, the application of WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL is somewhat ambiguous. The current president is eligible to seek a second term and under the Constitution of Sri Lanka, is authorised to call an election after completing four years of his current and first term. Regardless of whether this takes place, the next presidential election must be held no earlier than one month and no later than two months before the expiry of the incumbent's five-year term. At present, this article and several others are maintained as future elections, i.e., Next United Kingdom general election and Next Indian general election. The following categories are maintained for this pupose: Category:Future elections in Asia, Category:Future elections, etc. Therefore, this article should be treated in the same manner. It could be redirected to List of Sri Lankan presidential elections, but it would not be a fair position as references/sources have been provided to support maintaining this article and also provide historical context. QEnigma talk 04:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is very similar to Next Trinidad and Tobago general election, the election is not for another fourish years. There is not a notable reason to include this page this early. It would be like giving the 2038 U.S. election its own page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leader of the Opposition (Japan)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous discussion outlines the reasons for this well. It is not an official position in Japan and is not viewed as one in Japan either. No Japanese page similarly drives this point well Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete no refs that define the term. I checked a several refs, and they are fake or non-RS or broken. At best, they say "Yamada Gombei is the leader of the main oppo party", but it does not say he is an opposition leader. --Altenmann >talk 00:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as the page itself says, this is not a legal position in Japan. Given the paucity of sources, the rationale from the previous AfD still applies. JMWt (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Adolf Kunerth, "Sitzungsberichte. Academie Der Wissenschaften" vol 78(2), 1878, p 327-346, url="https://pdfhost.io/v/~OwxzpPNA_KUNERTH_1878" retrieved="30/05/2025"

[2] Leonard Eugene Dickson, "History of Numbers", vol 2, pp. 383–384.

[1]

[2]

v t e Jacques Derrida
Interview collections	Positions (1972) "The Rhetoric of Drugs" (1989) Points...: Interviews, 1974–1994 (1995)
Essays	"Cogito and the History of Madness" (1963) "Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences" (1966) Of Grammatology (1967) Speech and Phenomena (1967) Writing and Difference (1967) Margins of Philosophy (1972) Glas (1974) The Post Card (1980) Limited Inc. (1988) Right to Philosophy (1990) Acts of Literature (1991) Specters of Marx (1993) Archive Fever (1995) Ethics, Institutions, and the Right to Philosophy (2002) The Animal That Therefore I Am (2008)
Concepts	Deconstruction Différance Hauntology Template:Hauntology Kettle logic Phallogocentrism Phonocentrism Logocentrism Metaphysics of presence Free play Citationality Sous rature
Related articles	Marguerite Aucouturier Gadamer–Derrida debate Sokal affair Ghost Dance (film) Derrida The Reception of Derrida Searle–Derrida debate